Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't understand that argument. But in any case, Cantor's argument is very constructive. It literally gives you the decimal expansion of the new number not in your set.



I didn't do it that much justice because I was discovering it independently, my arguments can easily be made rigorous, but you'd need a background in pure mathematics to understand it. However, there's a section on Wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definable_real_number#Definabi...

They start with a stronger definition of a definable number, so they find that they do exist.

I think given the argument above there must be a hole in my own argument, I'd have to go beyond ZFC.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: