> It's still very much an open question as to whether congress is allowed to abdicate its power of rule making to the executive branch. The constitution seems to imply that the answer is "no," but the past interpretations of it say "yes." Chevron is a younger precedent than Roe.
You say abdicate. Not true.
Congress is obviously empowered to delegate.
Please be specific. Who (written where?) thinks this is an open question? Please cite evidence of this.
This is also a common theme of many recent cases. Examples include: American Hospital Association v. Becerra, SEC vs Cochran, SEC vs Jarkesky, Gundy vs United States.
It is not clear that Congress can actually "delegate" the power to write laws.
You say abdicate. Not true.
Congress is obviously empowered to delegate.
Please be specific. Who (written where?) thinks this is an open question? Please cite evidence of this.