that's a pretty heavy misrepresentation of this post.
actually one of those rare moments when i have to ask someone "did you even read the _title_", because you'll note it doesn't even say "trusted hardware" but "trustable hardware" and i've never heard that latter term used in the context you're alluding to.
I did not read the article, I've only read the title and from the title it wasn't clear there's no talk in the article about tamper-resistancy. I have no problem with trustable user-owned hardware as long as it doesn't contain any tamper-resistancy.
actually one of those rare moments when i have to ask someone "did you even read the _title_", because you'll note it doesn't even say "trusted hardware" but "trustable hardware" and i've never heard that latter term used in the context you're alluding to.