Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I would not be able to leave a Jetbrains product for Kotlin, or XCode for Swift

Overall it's so unfortunate that Jetbrains doesn't have a Cursor-level AI plugin* because Jetbrains IDEs by themselves are so much more powerful than base level VS Code it actually erases some small portion of the gains from AI...

(* people will link many Jetbrains AI plugins, but none are polished enough)




I probably would switch to Cursor for Swift projects too if it weren't for the fact that I will still need Xcode to compile the app.

I also agree with the non-AI parts of JetBrains stuff being much better than the non-AI parts of Cursor. Jetbrain's refactoring tools is still very unmatched.

That said, I think the AI part is compelling enough to warrant the switch. There are code rewrite tasks that JetBrains would struggle with, that LLMs can do fairly easily.


JetBrains is very interesting, what are the best performing extensions out there for it?

I do wonder what api level access do we get over there as well. For sidecar to run, we need LSP + a web/panel for the ux part (deeper editor layer like undo and redo stack access will also be cool but not totally necessary)


You can get both by using Aider (yes, confusingly similar name). https://aider.chat

It does the multi-file editing with asking to add files etc, but as a CLI/local web app tool.


No way I'd ever use a CLI tool to augment my work in an IDE. Completely backwards.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: